Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - swepart

Pages: 1 [2] 3
16
Definition Files / Re: POE Ciscos new 9x00 switch series
« on: April 29, 2019, 01:48:50 pm »
If I let you access  one I have in labb,,  would that help ?


17
Definition Files / Re: Def for Cisco C9300-24P
« on: April 28, 2019, 07:17:35 pm »
knottyau75, did you manage to get the POE values ?    I have tried with alot different values and settings but I cant manage to get it populated and visable on each interface.  I get sum of POE usage for the whole switch but not per interface

18
Definition Files / Re: POE Ciscos new 9x00 switch series
« on: April 21, 2019, 12:53:34 am »
Another weird thing is that in modules the switch is last in order


19
Definition Files / Re: POE Ciscos new 9x00 switch series
« on: April 18, 2019, 11:56:44 pm »
I have now tried with both ifmib and disprot, same result..
Something is different with with these Cisco 9x00-switches  or IOS-XE compared to other Cisco Switches.

I have dumped a complete snmpwalk from a 9200L switchstack,,  would that be to any help (BIG)

btw, is this the correct way to use usepoe

usepoe          C9200L-48P-4G-E         ifmib


/Swepart

20
Definition Files / POE Ciscos new 9x00 switch series
« on: April 11, 2019, 02:13:21 pm »
Models:  C9200, C9200L, C9300, C9400, C9500     https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/switches/catalyst-9000.html#~overview

I have tried to get POE values from different types of Ciscos new switches,,  downbelow I attached some screencaptures.
If I do a snmpwalk from inside Def-tool I can see that Nedi picks up POE values,   but when I do a discovery these values will not show up

Anyone have an idea ?



21
Installation / Re: Suggestions
« on: January 24, 2019, 03:02:40 pm »
I have done a test with mounting a disk directly to /var/nedi/rrd..   the result was good,  my disk load gone down with 50%

So my recommendation is to mount other disk for RRDs

FYI
I am using HP 146GB 2.5-inch SFF SAS 6Gb/s 15K RPM disks

22
Installation / Re: Suggestions
« on: January 20, 2019, 12:25:58 am »

I played around  with both LibreNMS and Observium and when having around 100-120 switches none of them was able to keep up with updating mysql and the RRD files..   When I looked into to the config file there was variable that pointed out where to find the RRD files so I simply changed the variable to point to another disk..   And now it works..

But to get even better performance I installed RRDcached (that is supporter by both) and when using ATOP command I can see that polling time have gone down substantially.

I will try to mount a disk under rrd-directory and see what the result is,,  it should work,  I think,,   what doesnt work is sym-links, RRD dont like that

I will also try  PHP devtools, iftools and nodetools and se if I can integrate with librenms/observium

About Grafana,  Grafana have a Mysql and PostGress connector.

I will come back about my tests

23
GUI / Re: Added functionality for Device screen
« on: January 12, 2019, 12:07:54 am »
If you like to have our src-code I can provide it


24
Installation / Suggestions
« on: January 11, 2019, 11:51:17 pm »
- Make it possible to place RRD on other path (in my case other disc,  this will speed up IO operations)
- Make it possible to use RRDcached (speed up IO)
- Integration with With LibreNMS or Observium (great for interface graphing / statistics,  I prefer LibreNMS )

Weird thoughts :)  howabout grafana,  influxdb and prometheus

25
GUI / Added functionality for Device screen
« on: November 08, 2018, 10:51:17 am »
We have added a input field in the device screen where you can add a comment to a device

see attached file  (new line in yellow)

26
Discovery / Re: Problem getting correct PoE Infos of Cisco Switches
« on: April 24, 2018, 09:47:24 pm »
I agree,  OID ending with 7 will give allocated power,   9 will give actual consumption..    I really dont know what one to use
If you want to be on safe side you might want to use 7,   if you want to actual usage,,  well then 9 is best

We might ask for some development/enhancement here.   Maybe Nedi should report both usage and Allocated 

   Use    Alloc
 6500/15400

Nowadays   we only use POE switches and so does our customers so I think having knowledge of POE usage and allocated is something that is needed

27
Discovery / Re: Problem getting correct PoE Infos of Cisco Switches
« on: April 23, 2018, 10:37:44 pm »
I got it work now, but i had to change OID. 
This OID  1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.402.1.2.1.9 give me wrong values, to low  (check with 'show power inline' )

1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.402.1.2.1.7 gives me same values as 'show power inline' command


28
Discovery / Re: Problem getting correct PoE Infos of Cisco Switches
« on: April 22, 2018, 11:45:53 pm »
I still have problem with POE on this switch model

what IOS version are you on,, I have c3560cx-universalk9-mz.152-4.E2.bin

My nedi.conf
# Set policy how poe delivery should be tracked per device type,
# or default for all (comment to ignore PoE completely):
# disprot       use the discovery protocol
# ifmib         get real value from the interfaces
# usepoe                default disprot
ifmib


and I am using this OID for POE in combination with IF-Name2index
1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.402.1.2.1.9

I am using 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.5.1.4.1.1.11 for poe index

29
With  Cisco Mobility Express you can use a Cisco 1800/2800/3800 AP as controller.  This is really neat, you dont need a WLC anymore.   You will not get all functions a WLC have but the most common is implemented in  "Mobility Express".    For handling in Nedi I have just copied the def-file for Cisco 5508 controller and that seems to be okey

cp 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1069.def  1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.2370.def  (2802 AP)
cp 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1069.def  1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.2371.def  (1832 AP)



30
Discovery / Re: Nedi 1.6 and Cisco AccessPoint 1800 series and 2800 series
« on: February 28, 2018, 11:30:34 pm »
That did the trick,  now its working

tnx

Pages: 1 [2] 3